This archive page collects pleadings, agency records, access history, scientific materials, and advocacy positions involving skate-based mobility aid access. It preserves the legal arguments and record facts without presenting every disputed issue as a final court determination.
Public-facing note: labels such as ADA, violation, ruling, precedent, discrimination, and medical necessity should be read in context. Some entries are court access records, some are administrative determinations, some are accommodation history, some are scientific interpretation, and some are pending or disputed advocacy claims.
Over two decades, government and private entities have repeatedly denied or limited access involving skates used as a mobility aid. The record includes transportation, housing, employment, and court-access disputes under ADA Titles I, II, III, and V. Some issues are documented accommodation history or administrative findings; others remain disputed legal claims.
These legal filings and scientific documents support the argument that skates can function as a mobility aid and that clearer identification could improve accommodation review. They do not by themselves resolve every medical, agency, or court question.
| Case ID | Description | Legal Document | Scientific Evidence | Ruling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSK-ACC | Landmark Civil Disobedience case asserting the use of skates as a mobility aid through deliberate boarding of CalTrain to trigger ADA litigation. | PLEADING: Discrimination of HandicapSkater Accessibility |
LETTER: BART (2004) - Refusal To Accommodate Skates
LETTER: DOJ (2006) - Requesting Final Written Disposition From DOT-FTA For ADA Compliance Using Skates LETTER: DOT-FTA (2007) - Fact Finding Letter to BART |
ORDER: Skate access was granted in the courtroom.
RULING: DFEH (2006) - No Probable Cause To Prove A Violation Of The Statute To Give Access With Prosthesis Skates Filed a Civil Rights Complaint involving DOT access issues; DOJ and DOT/FTA correspondence later addressed ParaTransit and reasonable-accommodation questions. ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION: DOT-FTA Letter of Finding involving access and ParaTransit issues Since 2007, I have relied on ParaTransit as a reasonable accommodation for my mobility disability. That year, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) determined that while transit agencies could prohibit the use of roller skates on platforms and vehicles, they could not ban their use in concourse areas or external facilities, as the agency failed to establish that such use posed a direct threat in those environments. Despite this administrative history, current transit access remains disputed. I am pursuing legal recourse and argue that the 2007 interpretation did not fully account for key biomechanical facts. I also argue that continued refusal to accommodate my mobility aid results in cutaway buses and prolonged ride durations, which exacerbate my injuries and cause undue physical harm. |
| HSK-DMV | License reinstatement case following a disputed DMV suspension, where I argue skates were treated as unsafe despite biomechanical evidence and driving proficiency. | PLEADING: HandicapSkater Driving Accommodation |
ARTICLE: Skates Are My Wheelchair: How I Fought to Ride a Motorcycle With a Disability They Refuse to See
VIDEO: Pass Driving Test Riding Motorcycle with Skates |
RULING: DMV Ruling PDF |
| HSK-EMP | Workplace accommodation and discrimination records involving denied or disputed reasonable accommodations and prior approved usage of skates under ADA Title I contexts. | CASE NOTES: DFEH AirBnB Reasonable Accommodation Case | ARTICLE: Employment Discrimination: Skates Are My Prosthesis -- Not a Toy | I dispute the DFEH handling of the case (~2021), and the EEOC interview process did not result in contact or resolution. |
| HSK-EVT | Complaint against the San Mateo Event Center alleging repeated ADA Title II and III access problems during public events involving prosthetic mobility aids. | VIDEO: San Mateo Event Center denying future access after successfully navigating San Mateo County Fair | ||
| HSK-FLY | ACAA and ADA-based filing against airline refusal to honor skates as a mobility aid, resulting in denial of air travel and familial visitation in 2025. | ARTICLE: Denied, Then Accepted: Flying With My Prosthetic Device, Skates |
San Francisco International Airport (SFO) gave me permission to use my prosthesis skates in 2005, which continues through today.
I have flown many times with my prosthesis, however in 2025, United refused and I flew on Delta. A case against United is being developed. |
|
| HSK-HOU | Housing accommodation dispute challenging denial of skate-based mobility aid in residential facilities and common areas. | ARTICLE: Housing Discrimination: Skates as Prosthesis Denied by Apartment Management | ||
| HSK-JUD | Judicial access cases citing due process denial, misconduct, and exclusion from courtrooms based on use of skates as an assistive device. | |||
| HSK-SYS | Comprehensive federal complaint alleging systemic ADA Title I, II, III, and V violations by local, state, and federal agencies over two decades. | ARTICLE: Systemic ADA Discrimination: When Every Sector Denies Your Prosthesis |